Can pragmatism and free will work together?
Pragmatism was the 3rd rule presented in our search for GSOT.[1] The rule of pragmatism can be stated simply: Unless it makes a difference in somebody’s disposition to act, then it makes no difference.
We have considered whether free will is valid under pragmatism. This does not mean proving that free will is true, probably an impossible task, but rather demonstrating that free will can constitute a clear and uncontradicted belief upon which a person can act.
It has seemed possible that free will might run afoul of a fundamental philosophical postulate – the principle of causation. Therefore, we looked in some detail at the apparent conflict between these 2 propositions:
- Every event has its cause.
- The ideas I/we bring up and the habits of responsive action I/we form can produce effects in the world.
The first proposition is essentially the same as the Principle of Sufficient Reason put forward by Leibniz as the foundation of all philosophy. The second is a statement of free will, although it could be viewed alternatively as a statement that posits a sense of my self or of our group as a locus of will. I shall call it a statement of free will. Continue reading “Pragmatism and Free Will” →